Scan barcode
ashergeorge's review against another edition
challenging
hopeful
informative
reflective
medium-paced
5.0
elliptica's review against another edition
challenging
informative
slow-paced
2.0
Some aspects of this book were great and I loved it.
Others were so boring and kinda abstract.
It took me waaaay too long to read.
I found some parts relatable and interesting.
But I liked the last two chapters the best somehow
Others were so boring and kinda abstract.
It took me waaaay too long to read.
I found some parts relatable and interesting.
But I liked the last two chapters the best somehow
dashaberga's review against another edition
challenging
hopeful
informative
reflective
medium-paced
4.25
lenin_lover_69's review against another edition
challenging
dark
hopeful
informative
reflective
medium-paced
5.0
bnbisch's review against another edition
informative
inspiring
reflective
slow-paced
4.0
An interesting and compelling audiobook that took me forever to get through. I’m glad I read it even though I didn’t actively enjoy reading it at every moment. It was a good one to walk the dog to, and I’m glad I went with the audio version. It definitely was my most academic book of the year, and I learned and thought a lot about it even if it was slow going.
lou_christie's review against another edition
challenging
dark
emotional
funny
hopeful
informative
inspiring
reflective
sad
tense
medium-paced
5.0
compostbin's review against another edition
A bit rambly at times, but I also was pretty riveted by Klein's train of thought. This book has definitely sat with me in the few weeks since I've read it, in part because Klein does a really excellent job of answering a lot of existential questions that exist on the left. In general, it was really cool to read a leftist's take on the left - a gentle, in-the-know criticism that didn't feel like "in fighting" or "you just don't know what leftism is". I was expecting slightly more narrative/memoir-y elements (the chapter about Klein's experience as a parent of an autistic child was probably my favorite chapter), but I also really appreciated her sweeping analyses. I left the book with a newfound empathy for conservatives and the conviction that it's us against systems of oppression, not us against each other, and that we all face the same existential threats endemic to the modern world. Klein reminds us that we don't have to invent conspiracies; there are plenty of real shadow figures making decisions for the rest of us that help them and hurt us. I feel like this book concretely affected my politics - I now share Klein's perspective that the left sometimes falls victim to its own "cancel culture" or, perhaps less provactively, a culture that is, in effect, more concerned with gatekeeping than bringing people in. Because, as Klein cogently argues, the left MUST bring people in. In a real way, the fate of the globe relies on it.
Also for the memories, here're some thoughts I wrote after listening to the first ~3 hours (I think): "I liked the memoir elements, surprise surprise, like the part about Naomi being a biblical name from a woman who decided to change her name from Naomi (pleasant) to mara (bitter), and how echoes of that were present for the author in her own name journey… idk I just love thinking about the significance of names and how our names can so often create tangible impacts in our lives.
Also for the memories, here're some thoughts I wrote after listening to the first ~3 hours (I think): "I liked the memoir elements, surprise surprise, like the part about Naomi being a biblical name from a woman who decided to change her name from Naomi (pleasant) to mara (bitter), and how echoes of that were present for the author in her own name journey… idk I just love thinking about the significance of names and how our names can so often create tangible impacts in our lives.
But the actual social commentary is feeling pretty basic to me right now. Maybe it’ll get more interesting, but right now it’s basically just “being online forces us to create our own doppelgängers- we are are forced to have branded presences that are both us and not. And that’s bad and inauthentic and capitalist.” I don’t disagree, and it’s definitely an interesting framing/metaphor. But it’s also not THAT interesting lol. The world being bad? Social media being shallow? Capitalism bleeds into every aspect of our lives and makes them worse? Yeah, I know lol."
onebademu's review against another edition
3.0
Disappointed. I had expected something else I think. I was excited about the ideas of exploring the nature of the Self, especially online with deep-fakes, AI, and just the normal masks we wear everywhere. However, I got something entirely different from this.
The writing, while competent, was largely a meandering pile of political ideologies in retaliation to a lot of far-right theories. It covers a lot of ground -- anti-Semitism, climate change, gun rights, QAnon, etc. Firstly, I am aware of my left-leaning political biases. Therefore reading this was an echo chamber of thoughts and ideas, and did not challenge me in any meaningful way. Most of the time I thought, "yes, and what is your point?"
Secondly, from the onset, I find issue with how Klein defines "doppelganger". Her issue with Naomi Wolf is just that she gets mistaken for her sometimes -- which is understandable, I feel that people get names of celebrities mixed up all the time, but by no means does anyone think that Klein looks like Wolf and vice versa. The premise seemed to be a flimsy thread to tie in Klein's views all together.
I also did not appreciate the "otherness" of language, even if I disagree with far-right fringe theories from Wolf, I don't like how we're calling that political spectrum a "shadow realm", "mirror world", or even "other Naomi". It just feels like it's adding fuel to the fire of political polarization that is so rampant.
Only in the first few and last chapters did the idea of mirror images of each other and the Self get explored, but really, most of the book read like a giant reactionary rant against far-right ideology and a "I am not Naomi Wolf!" cry.
The writing, while competent, was largely a meandering pile of political ideologies in retaliation to a lot of far-right theories. It covers a lot of ground -- anti-Semitism, climate change, gun rights, QAnon, etc. Firstly, I am aware of my left-leaning political biases. Therefore reading this was an echo chamber of thoughts and ideas, and did not challenge me in any meaningful way. Most of the time I thought, "yes, and what is your point?"
Secondly, from the onset, I find issue with how Klein defines "doppelganger". Her issue with Naomi Wolf is just that she gets mistaken for her sometimes -- which is understandable, I feel that people get names of celebrities mixed up all the time, but by no means does anyone think that Klein looks like Wolf and vice versa. The premise seemed to be a flimsy thread to tie in Klein's views all together.
I also did not appreciate the "otherness" of language, even if I disagree with far-right fringe theories from Wolf, I don't like how we're calling that political spectrum a "shadow realm", "mirror world", or even "other Naomi". It just feels like it's adding fuel to the fire of political polarization that is so rampant.
Only in the first few and last chapters did the idea of mirror images of each other and the Self get explored, but really, most of the book read like a giant reactionary rant against far-right ideology and a "I am not Naomi Wolf!" cry.