This is an interesting text for me.

Despite being on my to-be-read list anyway, I decided to read this play for the purpose of comparing it to 'The Great Gatsby' for my English Literature A-Level exam this month. This was certainly a good idea with there being many parallel themes surrounding the failed pursuit of the American Dream. Furthermore, the resemblance between the final chapter of 'The Great Gatsby' and the requiem of 'The Death of a Salesman' are so similar that I implore anyone to read both texts and see for themselves.

With that being said, whilst I found the premise and ending of the play to be exceptional, I can't say that I enjoyed this text as much as I think I should. I attribute this to be in part down to the formatting of the text as a play. Whilst I can imagine that seeing a production of this text would be phenomenal, I found the sequencing of the narrative quite difficult to follow - reality and illusion, present and flashback all blending into one. This was likely intentional from Miller, trying to present a similar disorientation for the reader as that felt by the protagonist Willy Loman (due to his slow descent into madness). Nevertheless, I think as a play (or alternatively written in the format of a novella) the narrative may have been easier to follow, therefore allowing the reader/watcher to engage to a greater extent with proceedings.

To reiterate, this is not a criticism to rubbish the text as a whole - I feel very fortunate to have read this work by Miller and I think it is completely deserving of its place in the literary canon. However, this does not elevate the text beyond fault and I can't help but feel reader enjoyment would've been improved with a greater clarity in formatting. 

a haunting tale about a family's destruction at the hands of the american dream

2nd time reading

Here’s the thing: stories written by American authors that challenge the myth of the American Dream often don’t resonate with me, at least not as much as I expect they’re intended to. There’s a cultural disconnect. That fairytale isn’t entrenched in my culture and we don’t really have an equivalent that inspires that same fanatic hope. I haven’t been fed this narrative since birth, I haven’t internalised its message, I have no attachment to it and what it represents. Refutation of a belief I do not hold doesn’t shock me, especially when I find that belief to be, frankly, obvious bullshit. To be fair, Death of a Salesman was written for theatre-going audiences in New York in the 1940s, not some anticapitalist Brit reading the script in book form more than seventy years later.

The titular salesman, Willy Loman, is painfully sympathetic and unsympathetic. He’s a deeply flawed individual who still has value simply by virtue of being human. That’s the idea, at least, but without an actor’s charisma to sell the character, to make me care about him, he’s a little too unpleasant for my liking. Shifting moral standards have no doubt shifted perspectives on Willy. For example, him threatening to beat his kids may have been seen as harsh back in the day but now most people would call that outright abusive. It makes it hard to root for him, though I understand it’s not supposed to be easy to.

Perhaps if I’d seen Death of a Salesman performed instead of reading the script I’d have had a more profound experience. As it stands, I can give a noncommittal shrug and confess it said what Miller wanted it to say but it didn’t speak to me. 

Pre-review note: I know this is a play and therefore is meant to be portrayed this way, and you obviously don’t get the seamless transitions and impact from reading it alone. 

It is a well written and theorised critique of capitalism and the so called ‘American Dream’ where we follow the Loman family (Willy, Linda, and their two grown up children Biff and Happy) along with other characters. The main story takes place over 2 days starting with Willy coming home early to find his children have come to see him, he’s obviously tired and work out from his job as a travailing salesman but tries to hide this. He talks with Biff about his life and, with Happy, think up a plan to go into business together and the following day Biff will ask a former employer for a loan and Willy buys into this dream. The following day Willy goes to work asking to be a stationary salesman as the travelling is too tiering at his age (50-60s I think) but is instead fired. He then goes for dinner with Biff (who’s plan didn’t go to plan) and Happy and have another argument which is picked up on at home where Biff lies out that he isn’t - and will never be - the man his father dreams and wants him to be and that he’s always struggled in jobs and life because from a young age this notion of you will have anything you want has been driven into him but instead it’s made him unresponsive to orders and hence failure. He says she’s going to leave and for his family not to worry about him anymore. A LOT more happens and there are flashbacks and side plots/characters too but I somewhat summarised the plot. 

This was good in how it shows the negatives of this ‘you are perfect’ notion we install in our kids and how nuance and real life is different and should be taught as well. Also Miller’s criticism of the ‘American Dream’ is done well and likewise capitalism and how the world is powered and centred on money, what we earn, what we can sell, these physical things not metaphoric ‘likeness’ or ‘respect’ which Willy seems to value more - at the end of the day they don’t pay the bills is the kind of ideal set out. 

What I didn’t like is how we are meant to symphysis’s without these characters but I didn’t… because to do so, we are normally meant to like them, but I didn’t. The portrayal of women isn’t the best with Linda really not adding much, she seems like a prop in some sense but of course at that time her position was seen as lesser then her husband’s and sons. Willy is shown to stop her speaking abruptly and rudely and in other aspects is not the nicest person suffering from some of what we’d now call fragile masculinity such as not talking about his mental health, thinking he needs to be the breadwinner and provide, not wanting to take favours and other things. Biff and Happy are okay but how they talk of ‘having’ girls and their outlook is rather sexist - how they’ve been brought up thinking they are the shit does impact this and possibly not all blame can be on them. These are just some thoughts. 

Lastly, despite being quite short (114 pages) it did somewhat drag on in some parts. As a beginner to plays I don’t think this was the best choice but all in all it did make sense and concluded in a understandable manner. 

It was okay with some important points but lacked characters I could bring myself to care about.