Reviews

The Man Who Was Thursday by G.K. Chesterton

cathy7's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Wow! I think I'll have to listen to it again (I got the audio book) because - wow - there is a lot going on in this story. Still very relevant today, just swap anarchists for terrorists. But beyond that there is a lot of philosophical stuff going on. At the moment (and it is one of those stories where you get different things out of it t different times) what strikes me is what it says about the nature of Truth. How it is like smoke - difficult to grasp and often just as you think you've got it, it changes

skylarh's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

This short novel is intriguing, humorous, clever, and spotted with stunning descriptions. Ostensibly, it is a tale of an undercover police man (Syme) seeking to infiltrate an organization of anarchists, controlled by the "Council of Seven Days" under the leadership of a man named Sunday. The novel is not as obviously allegorical as The Ball and The Cross, at least not until near the end, when it become entirely symbolic. I struggled with Chesteron's meaning when I concluded the novel, unsure of just what he was saying about God. At the end of my Wordsworth Classic edition, however, I found an excerpt with a note of admonition from the author himself: "I happen to have a very strong objection to that trick of missing the point of a story....I have sometimes had occasion to murmur meekly that those who endure the heavy labour of reading a book might possibly endure that of reading the title page of a book." I had not endured any such labor, and so I quickly thumbed to the title page to read: "The Man Who Was Thursday: A Nightmare." That little, two-word subtitle goes a long way toward explaining Chesterton's tale. But not having read it before launching into the story (I never waste time on test directions, either), I perhaps found the plot more mysterious and suspenseful than I might otherwise have done. Because I was not considering the story to be a nightmarish dream sequence, more possibilities lay open to my mind. Either way, The Man Who Was Thursday is a worthwhile read merely to enjoy Chesterton's play with words, and the beauty of his language.

mabry's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous funny mysterious reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

yumikofigaro's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

best book i've ever read, and i've read many

evgeorge's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark funny mysterious tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.0

karawithakay's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

This book is hard to categorize. I enjoyed reading it, but found it confusing. In particular towards the end when the majority of the characters describe a another character quite differently from how they have up to that point. These observations don't really seem to follow from what is revealed up to that point.

westenra's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

I usually dislike things that too English, too Christian or too comedic but this book is fantastic. 

Beautiful writing, extremely witty and silly at the same time. By the end I was so breathless that I might finally understand how those who are not just culturally Christian experience the sublime. 

gruenlichst's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging funny mysterious reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No

4.0

treebeard23's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

It’s a strange sensation to not be able to put down a book whose allegory I do not fully understand. What began as an interesting debate, became an absurd adventure, which became a thrilling chase, and finally a mind bending conclusion that I will no doubt be spending time thinking over in the days ahead.

maloryjkennedy10's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

I'm pretty sure I didn't understand half of this book. But it was a wild ride. Looking forward to the Literary Life Podcast fleshing this out for me. I think I will understand more with more readings.