Reviews

The Mystery of the Yellow Room by Gaston Leroux

forever_fantasy's review against another edition

Go to review page

funny mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.0

roxid's review against another edition

Go to review page

funny mysterious relaxing slow-paced

3.25

anniew415's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

A little old fashioned (mostly in language), but fun and entertaining. Still holds up.

quiet_chaos's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

First book I actually finished this year. The story felt like it dragged for a lot of the book and there were so many characters I could barely remember everyone's names. The writing also felt like it went in circles, and it was difficult to tell who was talking a lot of the time. Whole chapters would be a journal except, but with a few lines thrown in from the narrator as well.
All of that said, if you're looking for a whodunit that's not so much thriller like so many books today are, this fits the bill. I didn't see the ending coming, but I'm crap at guessing.
While 90% was resolved, it seems there's a sequel and the door was definitely left open for it. I have not yet decided when I'll read the next one, but I assume I will when the mood strikes me.

aliceinbookworld's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Η ιστορία μας διαδραματίζεται στη γαλλική εξοχή, και σε έναν πύργο όπου η νεαρή κόρη του επιστήμονα Στάγκερσον πέφτει θύμα επίθεσης μέσα στο δωμάτιό της, που όμως είναι κλειδωμένο από μέσα και τα παράθυρα είναι σφαλιστά κι αυτά από μέσα. Πρόκειται για ένα από τα πρώτα μυθιστορήματα κλειδωμένου δωματίου και αποτελεί ορόσημο της κλασικής αστυνομικής λογοτεχνίας που διαβάζεται και αγαπιέται από τους αναγνώστες μέχρι σήμερα. Ο ερευνητής της υπόθεσης, ο 18άχρονος δημοσιογράφος Ζοζέφ Ρουλεταμπίλ, θυμίζει κάτι από Τεντέν, καθώς είναι ιδιοφυής και πολυμήχανος, παρά το νεαρό της ηλικίας του.

Η ανάγνωση του βιβλίου δεν με κούρασε στιγμή, ενώ στοιχεία για τη λύση του υπήρχαν σε όλη τη διάρκεια, αν και δυσκολεύτηκα αρκετά να τα εντοπίσω εγκαίρως (ακόμα και μετά τα τόσα αστυνομικά που έχω διαβάσει!). Μόλις πήγαινα να κάνω μια εικασία, προέκυπταν νέα στοιχεία που την απέκλειαν, ενώ ο Ρουλεταμπίλ απαντούσε σε όλες τις απορίες μου, ακόμα κι αυτές που κάθονταν ακόμα στο πίσω πίσω μέρος του μυαλού μου κι εν τέλει δεν άφησε τίποτα αναπάντητο. Μου άρεσε και το ταξίδι σε αυτό τον φοβερό πύργο που συνέβαιναν τόσα παράξενα κι εκτίμησα τον νεαρό δημοσιογράφο, που αν και στην αρχή δεν με έπειθε όσον αφορά το νεαρό της ηλικίας του για τις ικανότητές του, τελικά συμπάθησα και θα ήθελα να διαβάσω ακόμη περισσότερα βιβλία όπου πρωταγωνιστεί.

Διαβάστε περισσότερα εδώ.

andrew_remon's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? N/A

3.75

staticdisplay's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

the story is told by Rouletabille's friend, some kind of lawyer who's never really established as a character other than that he can't really figure out what Rouletabille is up to. Rouletabille is a very young journalist who has a knack for solving unsolvable crimes. the entire mystery hinges on the victim/accused refusing to explain what they know.

I think I've read enough locked mystery rooms (although not my favorite mystery sub-genre) that I can now start to imagine some of the other explanations for these seemingly impossible crimes. I had figured out pieces of the solution and found the drama of the whole situation a bit over the top.

poirot's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

spiderwitch's review against another edition

Go to review page

mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Diverse cast of characters? No

3.0

amandagstevens's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

As a lover of the mystery genre, I'm happy to have read this early example of a closed-room mystery story. I can see its influence on Agatha Christie and on the genre itself. That said, since Hercule Poirot himself calls this story "very nearly" unfair, "but not quite" (see The Clocks), I think I will go ahead and just call it unfair.

Can the reader suspect the correct person, given the clues? Yes, at least for a few minutes. But can the reader have any inkling who this person actually is, what his motives might be, how many layers of history the story has? No, not until our resident Boy Wonder spouts the whole thing in the final act. I realize the Expositional Big Reveal is often part of early mystery stories, and maybe I'd mind less if I didn't so strongly dislike amateur detective Rouletabille (for being such a ridiculously special genius) and narrator buddy Sainclair (for being so pointless and useless I forgot his name).

Conclusion: it's a solid story told less-than-fairly, a really smart mystery populated with flat characters.