You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.

Reviews

Doctor Who: Human Nature by Paul Cornell

philosopher_kj's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? N/A
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

kmelion72's review against another edition

Go to review page

fast-paced

4.5

philosopher_kj's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional mysterious sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? N/A
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25

bleary's review

Go to review page

5.0

Seminal

plaidbrarian's review

Go to review page

4.0

Honestly, if you're going to read a Doctor Who novel, this is the one.

scampr's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional funny hopeful mysterious reflective tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.75

There's a reason this story was adapted for TV. With all the themes, complexities and hallmarks of the VNAs this book also manages to stand on its own as just a really great story in its own right, for how it explores identity, history and morality. While a lot will be familiar to those that know the on screen version, the novel expands or changes the backstory of events, characters, motivations, and some specifics of the action - so although this story may be dense, every detail feels important. I adore both versions of this story because whichever way you experience it the simplifications or expansions perfectly serve their respective characters and plots.

dragoninatrenchcoat's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional reflective sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes

bexh's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional funny medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

kristamccracken's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Wonderful story and vibrant characters. I really enjoyed Bernice Summerfield and the inclusion of the queer male couple in the story. Would recommend to anyone interested in trying out a DW book.

nwhyte's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

http://nwhyte.livejournal.com/546675.html[return][return]This Seventh Doctor plus Bernice Summerfield New Adventure is really rather good. Paul Cornell here asks the unaskable: what if the Doctor were to try being human for a while, to live and love like the rest of us? He has managed to get to the heart of the Doctor's mythos. I found it very satisfying, and raced to finish it, to the point of waking up early this morning to do so. It's the first of the Doctor Who books I have downloaded that I would really like to spend money on for a dead trees version.[return][return]Bits I particularly liked: I thought the character of Verity resonated particularly effectively. "Verity" of course means Truth, and she holds the key to the truth about the Doctor's character; the name of course also recalls the real-life origins of Doctor Who; and the character herself is of course a very close reflection of Neil Gaiman's Death.[return][return]I also very much liked the human relationships of the book. I caught on to the true nature of Shuttleworth's liaisons pretty early on; the John Smith and Joan Redfern relationship was neatly done; and the Epilogue, which the author admits he had doubts about putting in, was very effective.[return][return]Great lines, too:[return]"You may know me as mild-mannered John Smith, history teacher, but secretly I'm the Doctor, universal righter of wrongs and protector of cats."[return]"So what did you say to him," the Doctor asked. [return]"That he believes in good and fights evil. That, with violence all around him, he's a man of peace. Thet he's never cruel, or cowardly. That he is a hero."[return]Sure, the book has its flaws, as mercilessly pointed out by some of the Doctor Who Ratings Guide reviewers (though most of them loved it). I'm with the Discontinuity Guide folks, though. I don't think I've read a better Doctor Who novel.[return]---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------[return]http://nwhyte.livejournal.com/2058053.html[return][return]This is still the only Who novel to have been adapted for television rather than the other way round. I first read it, gulp, seven years ago - the first Seventh Doctor novel I ever read - and would have been rereading it anyway as I shall be rewatching the TV episode soon.[return][return]Now that I have read the previous 37 New Adventures, I still think this is one of the best in the series. It is better than most Who novels as a standalone (though Niall Harrison found the continuity heavy going), the major reference to previous novels being to Benny's loss of her lover in the Albigensian crusade. The Doctor is absent from most of the book and needs to be explained to his own alter ego, John Smith, whose final sacrifice is very effective.