Take a photo of a barcode or cover
librarianna81's review against another edition
2.0
What a difficult book to slog through. It had its moments, and I enjoyed a lot of the description and feel of India (the reader was excellent at doing the voices, and really brought out the characters), but it just felt...pointless. I was frustrated by a bunch of story lines that just seemed never to find resolution because the book came to a very abrupt end (it seemed to me). I understood the message at the end, but I was curious to see what happened to Kim, and will never find out. He was such a great character with so much potential - an Irish boy who had essentially "gone native" in India, and therefore was able to straddle so much of the divided Imperial British society. His ability to do so made for some great sub-stories. I loved his character, but I am hard-pressed to give the overall book more than 2 stars, unfortunately. I will have to read The Jungle Book to see how it compares for adventure and story; I know that one is a true favorite of Kipling's.
vanishingworld's review against another edition
Instead of a review, I'm just posting a comment I made on a writer's blog, who advanced the idea that Kipling's book was inherently racist. Pretty much sums up my feelings about the book.
**
Gosh, I really disagree about Kipling’s intent in Kim. I don’t think taking a quote from a character–the soldier who says the idea of natives ruling themselves is “madness”–and then ascribing that quote to the author himself is fair. I happen to be a writer myself, and I shudder to think that some of the things my less savory characters say could be confused with what I personally believe. I just finished reading Kim and I was amazed by how well Kipling understood the culture and how deeply Kim connected to his native friends, the lama, and the culture at large. The lama and Kim have the deepest, most meaningful relationship in the book; Kim is in awe of Huree Babu; and he is loyal to Mahtub. His relationships with the whites in this book, on the other hand, are superficial, full of suspicion and disdain, and only a means to an end. When, at one point, Kim falls prey to the pleasure of hearing himself praised by government officials, Kipling is quick to point this out as a failing.
I mean, at the end of the book, Kim says emphatically, in more than one way, to the lama: “I am not a Sahib; I am your chela.” If Kipling believed as the soldier did, I don’t think we’d see these lines in the book, and certainly not at the end, where they appear and where the reader is left to draw her final conclusion about who Kim is. Just my two cents. I thought it was actually an enlightened (no pun intended) book for its time.
**
Gosh, I really disagree about Kipling’s intent in Kim. I don’t think taking a quote from a character–the soldier who says the idea of natives ruling themselves is “madness”–and then ascribing that quote to the author himself is fair. I happen to be a writer myself, and I shudder to think that some of the things my less savory characters say could be confused with what I personally believe. I just finished reading Kim and I was amazed by how well Kipling understood the culture and how deeply Kim connected to his native friends, the lama, and the culture at large. The lama and Kim have the deepest, most meaningful relationship in the book; Kim is in awe of Huree Babu; and he is loyal to Mahtub. His relationships with the whites in this book, on the other hand, are superficial, full of suspicion and disdain, and only a means to an end. When, at one point, Kim falls prey to the pleasure of hearing himself praised by government officials, Kipling is quick to point this out as a failing.
I mean, at the end of the book, Kim says emphatically, in more than one way, to the lama: “I am not a Sahib; I am your chela.” If Kipling believed as the soldier did, I don’t think we’d see these lines in the book, and certainly not at the end, where they appear and where the reader is left to draw her final conclusion about who Kim is. Just my two cents. I thought it was actually an enlightened (no pun intended) book for its time.
k1teach2's review against another edition
5.0
A wonderful book. The narrator, Madhav Sharma, was amazing. He really brought the characters to life.
jembw's review against another edition
4.0
I started this book so many times when I was younger and abandoned it largely because I found the prose such heavy going. Returning to it one last time – as an audiobook on this occasion – was a real joy. The narrator, Sam Dastor, really made it happen for me and is a real master when it comes to accents and different voices for different characters. It also helps that, now I have travelled to India so many times and lived there for a spell, I have much greater empathy for the story knowing more about the different places and cultures in India (and what is now Pakistan).
paigeforster's review against another edition
adventurous
challenging
dark
informative
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.25
taetris's review against another edition
1.0
My expectations of this book were low - I expected some pretty atrocious racism and sexism at the least.
These things were definitely not as bad as I had thought. The quotes that stood out to me were "Kim could lie like an Oriental", "...the opium that is meat, tobacco and medicine to the spent Asiatic" and some references to "civilised countries. The sexism too, wasn't too bad.
However, I thought the plot was a complete mess. Half the time I did not know what was going on, and the other half it made little sense. Then there were the sometimes laboured and sometimes nonesensical dialogues.
All in all, I didn't find anything to like about this book.
These things were definitely not as bad as I had thought. The quotes that stood out to me were "Kim could lie like an Oriental", "...the opium that is meat, tobacco and medicine to the spent Asiatic" and some references to "civilised countries. The sexism too, wasn't too bad.
However, I thought the plot was a complete mess. Half the time I did not know what was going on, and the other half it made little sense. Then there were the sometimes laboured and sometimes nonesensical dialogues.
All in all, I didn't find anything to like about this book.
rysack's review against another edition
2.0
Sadly, after much reading of The Great Game and this book's place within it, I found Kim to be a very hard book to read and enjoy.
Perhaps it was the sometimes dated language, perhaps it was the lack of any real enthralling narrative, or perhaps it is a sign that reading has evolved since 1900 and I'm not yet in a place to assimilate my preferences to include writing of that time.
However, there are many out there who love Kim and I am excited to read more of the backstory in my next book.
Perhaps it was the sometimes dated language, perhaps it was the lack of any real enthralling narrative, or perhaps it is a sign that reading has evolved since 1900 and I'm not yet in a place to assimilate my preferences to include writing of that time.
However, there are many out there who love Kim and I am excited to read more of the backstory in my next book.
dyno8426's review against another edition
adventurous
hopeful
informative
lighthearted
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Kipling probably saw a future of India where Britishers kept ruling. It picturizes a society which has accustomed itself to an assimilation of foreigners controlling the society of natives. It does not claim it to be smooth or peaceful, but rather something that is still in the process of settling. However, it does not consider India as an antagonist to be tamed under the superior civilization of British. It embraces India for all its complexity and a character vastly different than England. The author displays his enthusiasm in observing and showcasing all the multitude of textures, sensations and gradients that Indian society has to offer by its sheer scale and enormity. From the people to the places, the author has diligently observed and registered these allures of India that would culturally shock and sensationalise India for foreigners. Through the character of Kim, a nativized child of foreigners, it presents British ethnicity subsumed in the already meshed up fabric of Indian society. Indian society has put its colors and characters on Kim, so much so that you would not be able to figure out that he is next generation of foreign race settled in India. Plus he is shown as a poor English. His nondescript, destitute existence perfectly blends with the majority of humble India of those times. And the very reason India accepts Kim's orphaned existence under its smorgasbord of life. Even in this theme of India accepting British imperialism as its inseparable history going forward, Kim's natural street-smartness and sense of loyalty to his benefactors is also shown as an instrument of success and moving up in life. He joins "The Great Game" of espionage where native Indians are serving as relayers of intelligence for British controlling any sort of resistance or mutiny from Indian factions. Kim's troubled origins has also hardened him to the cruelty, suffering and indifference that people are capable of inflicting on each other in order to survive. For a young child living on the streets and who grew up seeing secret messages being passed under the cover of darkness, we see Kim witnessing horrifying actions while growing up in this backdrop. But Kim sees his own capacity to accept the dangerous rules and even outmanoeuvre the players of the Game. He is curious and he learns. He enjoys the thrill and sense of service to those who employ him. And it is the British rule that creates this opportunity and promise of his upliftment. He goes on to become an emerging, proficient spy for the Britishers.
What bugs me is Kim's character-relationship with the counterpart in the story, a Buddhist lama whom Kim accompanies in his philosophical "Search" on the "Way" towards a "River" of enlightenment. This journey is supposed to deliver the lama from all the worldliness that his philosophy has made him aware and ready to be rid of. He is pretty much disillusioned as typical Buddhist monks are (or working towards to be). Kim's chance encounter with this lama is also perceived as a favorable outcome of providence/universe by the lama in facilitating his search. Kim finds another object for applying his natural loyalty. The lama almost becomes a father figure for Kim. Apart from taking support from him, he facilitates Kim's education in making him a true British "Sahib". However, there is something lacking in the contrast between the lama who is trying to dissociate from all the worldly routines and systems, and Kim who appreciates and relishes in the all the textures of Indian life that he witnesses around him as per my reading. Opposites attract and what not. But there is still a missing gap in this strange connection that forms between these two travelers. Kim follows the lama in his search across India. However, there's no serious communication or events that explain how Kim's attachment develops for person who is completely different in his outlook and pursuit of life from Kim. One would expect lama's philosophy to renounce the material connections to be the prime appealing factor. But Kim is too young and excited to find this radical perspective appealing. I could only interpret his devotion to the lama as a substitution for a parent that Kim never grew up with. Kim also finds a purpose in protecting the lama from the harshness and practical difficulties that he is bound to find himself in. And that's not ill-used or a hollow trope here. The piecing together of this interesting relationship feels less impressive than it could from reading the text. Even in the adventures they undergo together while on lama's Search and Kim's secret missions from the Great Game, it appears as if they are sticking together for no reason except for the fact that they are two loners who found each other by chance. It is of course heart-warming and admirable in Kim who develops this connection. It makes his life more fulfilling and promising as we see him growing up. Kim will not just survive but foster in the chaotic, vibrant India which he seems to love and call his homeland. Having said that, the weak parts of the story are difficult to ignore. The pan-India adventures that Kim and the lama undergo are not exciting enough. The "secret agent" hooks have underdeveloped mystery and thrill. And the main promising part of the evolution of Kim's character exclusively through his contact with lama is not nurtured enough, while clearly being the locus of all movement. All these shortcomings sadly left me unfulfilled.
What bugs me is Kim's character-relationship with the counterpart in the story, a Buddhist lama whom Kim accompanies in his philosophical "Search" on the "Way" towards a "River" of enlightenment. This journey is supposed to deliver the lama from all the worldliness that his philosophy has made him aware and ready to be rid of. He is pretty much disillusioned as typical Buddhist monks are (or working towards to be). Kim's chance encounter with this lama is also perceived as a favorable outcome of providence/universe by the lama in facilitating his search. Kim finds another object for applying his natural loyalty. The lama almost becomes a father figure for Kim. Apart from taking support from him, he facilitates Kim's education in making him a true British "Sahib". However, there is something lacking in the contrast between the lama who is trying to dissociate from all the worldly routines and systems, and Kim who appreciates and relishes in the all the textures of Indian life that he witnesses around him as per my reading. Opposites attract and what not. But there is still a missing gap in this strange connection that forms between these two travelers. Kim follows the lama in his search across India. However, there's no serious communication or events that explain how Kim's attachment develops for person who is completely different in his outlook and pursuit of life from Kim. One would expect lama's philosophy to renounce the material connections to be the prime appealing factor. But Kim is too young and excited to find this radical perspective appealing. I could only interpret his devotion to the lama as a substitution for a parent that Kim never grew up with. Kim also finds a purpose in protecting the lama from the harshness and practical difficulties that he is bound to find himself in. And that's not ill-used or a hollow trope here. The piecing together of this interesting relationship feels less impressive than it could from reading the text. Even in the adventures they undergo together while on lama's Search and Kim's secret missions from the Great Game, it appears as if they are sticking together for no reason except for the fact that they are two loners who found each other by chance. It is of course heart-warming and admirable in Kim who develops this connection. It makes his life more fulfilling and promising as we see him growing up. Kim will not just survive but foster in the chaotic, vibrant India which he seems to love and call his homeland. Having said that, the weak parts of the story are difficult to ignore. The pan-India adventures that Kim and the lama undergo are not exciting enough. The "secret agent" hooks have underdeveloped mystery and thrill. And the main promising part of the evolution of Kim's character exclusively through his contact with lama is not nurtured enough, while clearly being the locus of all movement. All these shortcomings sadly left me unfulfilled.
pawact's review against another edition
3.0
This is a classic that didn't completely move and enthrall me. It was interesting but a bit of a slog to get through. Kim is a half-Irish, half-Indian street urchin that is precocious, enthusiastic and conniving. Desperate to experience everything around him, he gloms onto a lama who is on a spiritual journey. On his way he gets into a bit of espionage due to his friendship with a famous Indian horse trader, ends up in a British boarding school to continue his education and finally in the mountains of the Himalayas as a spy. It's a bit of a boy's adventure book but it is also a meditation on identity as Kim tries to figure out if he is Indian or Irish, brown or white, a spy or a chala (assistant to priest).
The writing style is deliberately choppy and episodic and it was sometimes hard for me to read and completely understand. And there are moments when the novel really slows down.
Not terrible, for sure, but not a book I would read again.
The writing style is deliberately choppy and episodic and it was sometimes hard for me to read and completely understand. And there are moments when the novel really slows down.
Not terrible, for sure, but not a book I would read again.
nes_coffee_ic's review against another edition
5.0
Fantastic book, a true adventure book. Despite the obvious and expected racial slurs, it is a work of one master of fiction. Totally recommended.