Scan barcode
helgamharb's review
DNF
Read up to page 200.
Sorry to say this book was dry as a desert. Monotonous, full of facts and information, dates and numbers, without being engaging and capturing the imagination.
If anyone knows of a non-boring book about the World War I, recommendations will be appreciated.
Read up to page 200.
Sorry to say this book was dry as a desert. Monotonous, full of facts and information, dates and numbers, without being engaging and capturing the imagination.
If anyone knows of a non-boring book about the World War I, recommendations will be appreciated.
chapita4's review
Wow, did I struggle with this book! I am not familiar enough with European geography to know where cities are located. It was very informative and had an overwhelming amount of information. I read to the middle of the book before I gave up. I didn't think I was retaining enough information to make it worthwhile to keep reading. This was a library book and the due date was closing in fast....maybe another time.
jamelchior's review
4.0
Keegan’s one-volume history of the First World War is primarily a military history, and one that gives an exceptionally clear explanation of how the entire military action of the war unfolded. Strengths include the author’s depth of knowledge and the care taken with the detail of the armies and their commanders, what they were thinking, and what made them succeed or fail.
This isn’t a war account designed to make you feel; it’s one that insists that you think, and helps you to think. I had to read it slowly, and at times I felt frustrated. The author refrains from taking sides or creating heroes. Instead, he’s interested in universal human characteristics, including why armies sometimes stop fighting, and why people are crazy enough to fight in the first place.
This isn’t a war account designed to make you feel; it’s one that insists that you think, and helps you to think. I had to read it slowly, and at times I felt frustrated. The author refrains from taking sides or creating heroes. Instead, he’s interested in universal human characteristics, including why armies sometimes stop fighting, and why people are crazy enough to fight in the first place.
tomsowa's review against another edition
5.0
Extensive and impressive
John Keegan traces the sweep of the Great War in a style of historical researcher and astonished student of human folly. His book could be subtitled “How A Continent Foolishly Marched Into A lethal Madness”
John Keegan traces the sweep of the Great War in a style of historical researcher and astonished student of human folly. His book could be subtitled “How A Continent Foolishly Marched Into A lethal Madness”
soundracer's review
5.0
In my quest to learn more about World War I, I started with "The Guns of August" -- a great book in itself -- which comes to an abrupt stop in August 1914, when the war of movement ends and the war of trenches begins. I wanted to know, "What happened next"? Keegan's one volume history offers a thorough answer to that question.
Keegan is first and foremost a military historian and the narrative is framed by the war's great battles -- including those of 1914. But he includes enough political and social context to paint a complete picture of why things progressed as they did. The Western Front is very well covered but Keegan also sheds light on the lesser known (and just as horrific) events in the East and South (Italy). Other theaters, particularly the Middle East and Turkey (Gallipoli) are covered more lightly.
Keegan's prose is a bit florid and took some getting used to, but his summation of the war in the closing pages (which is not to be missed) is quite elegant. Main drawback, as with so much military history, is the maps -- not enough detail and hard to read, at least in the paperback version.
Keegan is first and foremost a military historian and the narrative is framed by the war's great battles -- including those of 1914. But he includes enough political and social context to paint a complete picture of why things progressed as they did. The Western Front is very well covered but Keegan also sheds light on the lesser known (and just as horrific) events in the East and South (Italy). Other theaters, particularly the Middle East and Turkey (Gallipoli) are covered more lightly.
Keegan's prose is a bit florid and took some getting used to, but his summation of the war in the closing pages (which is not to be missed) is quite elegant. Main drawback, as with so much military history, is the maps -- not enough detail and hard to read, at least in the paperback version.
bkeving_74's review against another edition
4.0
Interesting
My main interest is in WW2 but to understand that war I felt I had to go back to the Great War. It helps put the later war into context. Trench warfare reading is not as captivating as the military movements in the Second World War. Nonetheless it was necessary for me to understand what happened at that time.
My main interest is in WW2 but to understand that war I felt I had to go back to the Great War. It helps put the later war into context. Trench warfare reading is not as captivating as the military movements in the Second World War. Nonetheless it was necessary for me to understand what happened at that time.