I do not remember liking "The Rotter's Club" when I read it. Now, I've picked up "The House of Sleep" and "The Winshaw Legacy" and I want to read everything from Coe that I can get my hands on. Enjoyed many things in this book that I liked in TWL. Plot is jumping back and forth in time; everything is tied to sleep and sleep related issues; things go all over the place and many folks are not what they appear to be. Not so much political discussion in this one compared to TWL, but it's there in many ways. The ending makes you think about what may happen next--no neat little gift bows with this guy. I just hated to see it end.

I love Coe’s writing style but the plot relies on slightly too many coincidences and oblivious characters to feel really compelling.

I fell in love with this book. It's so rich - all these characters somehow related by a period of time, and the book traces all those meetings in the past, and also their lives from then, in alternate chapters, until it all collides; twisty and compelling and just absolutely great.

Very surreal, inspired British novel, kind of a thriller. Highly entertaining.

Another excellent one

Fantastic writing! Great story!

After I finished this very complicated story, struggling to figure out the order of events, I found that I had missed this "Author's Note" at the beginning: "The odd numbered chapters in this novel are set mainly in the years 1983-1984. The even numbered chapters are set in the last two weeks of June 1996." That would have been a big help!

Actually I think I did pretty well given that the author thought it necessary to include that note. There was really only one event that I had trouble placing in time. As you've probably gathered, the story is somewhat of a puzzle, although a fun one. It's one of those books that, after finishing, you have the vague feeling you should have read it more carefully. You're thinking, "Why wasn't I paying more attention when that [seemingly inconsequential event] happened?" You'd like to read it again to understand the story better, but it's too long for that.

I wouldn't call it "funny" or "droll" (as one of the cover blurbs states). I did laugh, but overall it's more like "wacky". It has odd characters, strange situations and a sweet, if unusual, love story. And don't ask me exactly what I mean by this, but it's quite "British". On the down side, I think Adam would say there were several incidents described at length that didn't do anything to propel the narrative and at least one minor character the author invented simply to stitch part of the puzzle together.