Scan barcode
![Chaucer, Boccaccio and the Debate of Love: A Comparative Study of the Decameron and the Canterbury Tales by N.S. Thompson](https://558130.bdp32.group/rails/active_storage/representations/redirect/eyJfcmFpbHMiOnsibWVzc2FnZSI6IkJBaHBCRGhxcXdRPSIsImV4cCI6bnVsbCwicHVyIjoiYmxvYl9pZCJ9fQ==--4b5e0fd58c9f34902a12f5967b0436c355ed497a/eyJfcmFpbHMiOnsibWVzc2FnZSI6IkJBaDdCem9MWm05eWJXRjBTU0lJYW5CbkJqb0dSVlE2RkhKbGMybDZaVjkwYjE5c2FXMXBkRnNIYVFJc0FXa0M5QUU9IiwiZXhwIjpudWxsLCJwdXIiOiJ2YXJpYXRpb24ifX0=--038335c90cf75c275ae4d36968ac417dc4a0a3e3/Chaucer,%20Boccaccio%20and%20the%20Debate%20of%20Love-%20A%20Comparative%20Study%20of%20the%20Decameron%20and%20the%20Canterbury%20Tales.jpg)
354 pages • missing pub info (editions)
ISBN/UID: 9780198186465
Format: Paperback
Language: English
Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA
Publication date: 28 November 1996
Description
The two collections are examined in the light of their literary diversity, their shape as a form of quodlibet debate, their discussion of literature and its autonomy, using the oppositions of utile-diletto and 'sentence'-'solaas', and in the speci...
Community Reviews
Content Warnings
![Chaucer, Boccaccio and the Debate of Love: A Comparative Study of the Decameron and the Canterbury Tales by N.S. Thompson](https://558130.bdp32.group/rails/active_storage/representations/redirect/eyJfcmFpbHMiOnsibWVzc2FnZSI6IkJBaHBCRGhxcXdRPSIsImV4cCI6bnVsbCwicHVyIjoiYmxvYl9pZCJ9fQ==--4b5e0fd58c9f34902a12f5967b0436c355ed497a/eyJfcmFpbHMiOnsibWVzc2FnZSI6IkJBaDdCem9MWm05eWJXRjBTU0lJYW5CbkJqb0dSVlE2RkhKbGMybDZaVjkwYjE5c2FXMXBkRnNIYVFJc0FXa0M5QUU9IiwiZXhwIjpudWxsLCJwdXIiOiJ2YXJpYXRpb24ifX0=--038335c90cf75c275ae4d36968ac417dc4a0a3e3/Chaucer,%20Boccaccio%20and%20the%20Debate%20of%20Love-%20A%20Comparative%20Study%20of%20the%20Decameron%20and%20the%20Canterbury%20Tales.jpg)
354 pages • missing pub info (editions)
ISBN/UID: 9780198186465
Format: Paperback
Language: English
Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA
Publication date: 28 November 1996
Description
The two collections are examined in the light of their literary diversity, their shape as a form of quodlibet debate, their discussion of literature and its autonomy, using the oppositions of utile-diletto and 'sentence'-'solaas', and in the speci...