Scan barcode
![The Argument from Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism by Bonnie Paulson, Stanley Paulson, Robert Alexy](https://558130.bdp32.group/rails/active_storage/representations/redirect/eyJfcmFpbHMiOnsibWVzc2FnZSI6IkJBaHBBOXBmcHc9PSIsImV4cCI6bnVsbCwicHVyIjoiYmxvYl9pZCJ9fQ==--6325313df8b3b683baf6cc4635e5faa0b6d05d74/eyJfcmFpbHMiOnsibWVzc2FnZSI6IkJBaDdCem9MWm05eWJXRjBTU0lJYW5CbkJqb0dSVlE2RkhKbGMybDZaVjkwYjE5c2FXMXBkRnNIYVFJc0FXa0M5QUU9IiwiZXhwIjpudWxsLCJwdXIiOiJ2YXJpYXRpb24ifX0=--038335c90cf75c275ae4d36968ac417dc4a0a3e3/The%20Argument%20from%20Injustice-%20A%20Reply%20to%20Legal%20Positivism.jpg)
160 pages • first pub 1992 (editions)
ISBN/UID: 9780199584215
Format: Paperback
Language: English
Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA
Publication date: 22 February 2010
Description
At the heart of this book is the age-old question of how law and morality are related. The legal positivist, insisting on the separation of the two, explicates the concept of law independently of morality. The author challenges this view, arguing ...
Community Reviews
Content Warnings
![The Argument from Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism by Bonnie Paulson, Stanley Paulson, Robert Alexy](https://558130.bdp32.group/rails/active_storage/representations/redirect/eyJfcmFpbHMiOnsibWVzc2FnZSI6IkJBaHBBOXBmcHc9PSIsImV4cCI6bnVsbCwicHVyIjoiYmxvYl9pZCJ9fQ==--6325313df8b3b683baf6cc4635e5faa0b6d05d74/eyJfcmFpbHMiOnsibWVzc2FnZSI6IkJBaDdCem9MWm05eWJXRjBTU0lJYW5CbkJqb0dSVlE2RkhKbGMybDZaVjkwYjE5c2FXMXBkRnNIYVFJc0FXa0M5QUU9IiwiZXhwIjpudWxsLCJwdXIiOiJ2YXJpYXRpb24ifX0=--038335c90cf75c275ae4d36968ac417dc4a0a3e3/The%20Argument%20from%20Injustice-%20A%20Reply%20to%20Legal%20Positivism.jpg)
160 pages • first pub 1992 (editions)
ISBN/UID: 9780199584215
Format: Paperback
Language: English
Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA
Publication date: 22 February 2010
Description
At the heart of this book is the age-old question of how law and morality are related. The legal positivist, insisting on the separation of the two, explicates the concept of law independently of morality. The author challenges this view, arguing ...