I knew this book was short when I grabbed it on Hoopla, but I didn't realize that part of the problem with the book was that it was sparse on facts. The conclusion actually laughably starts with something along the lines of "there is no denying Bigfoot is real." Well, the denial is that this book offers no 'proof' of anything at all. It shows a few different famous images of Bigfoot (some of which have actually been disproven), adds a few encounter stories (which are good but not really verified), and then just says... duh, Bigfoot is real. Look, I didn't expect this book to prove Bigfoot existed. But I did expect it to be scholarly (my fault, really). Maybe this was for kids?