Take a photo of a barcode or cover
cardigan06's review against another edition
informative
reflective
medium-paced
3.75
interesting , learned a lot
veronicacanread's review against another edition
challenging
informative
reflective
medium-paced
4.0
keithfarrell's review against another edition
4.0
I wish I learned a little bit more about the Iranian revolution, but at 150 pages, this was never going to be a comprehensive account. Kapuscinski provides interesting vignettes and mini tales of horror. Another reminder that most of today’s unstable regimes can be traced back to the United States and more specifically the short sighted CIA
ulanur's review against another edition
informative
reflective
medium-paced
4.5
Written with an experienced veteran journalists keen observations, this tiny book boils down a revolution generations in the making to a few flash points. He describes the last Shah of Iran, a ruler with absolute power, living in a universe completely removed from his subjects.
Kapuścinski witnessed 27 revolutions during his tenure as a foreign correspondent. He reported on the decolonisation in Africa, and in South America, so he tends towards making sweeping generalisations while discussing revolution. By no measure an expert on Iranian history or culture, yet he manages to capture the atmosphere of dread, the fear that permeated every day; the reign of terror of the Savak, the secret police.
He does leave out some essentials, like CIA intervention, but the book as a whole focuses more on the mentality that developed in the public rather than the foreign influences, on the grassroots engine of a revolution. I really enjoyed the way he depicted Mosaddegh, the prime minister, and his fraught relationship with the Shah. He also stays away from dry historical facts like exact dates and random names in favour of some journalistic liberties to give a simpler, purer portrait of events.
The best thing about this book is that it made me do research. I was on the internet every few pages looking things up out if genuine curiousity, because it got me so invested in finding out every detail. I didn't know very much about the Iranian Revolution before so I'm so glad I read this.
Kapuścinski witnessed 27 revolutions during his tenure as a foreign correspondent. He reported on the decolonisation in Africa, and in South America, so he tends towards making sweeping generalisations while discussing revolution. By no measure an expert on Iranian history or culture, yet he manages to capture the atmosphere of dread, the fear that permeated every day; the reign of terror of the Savak, the secret police.
He does leave out some essentials, like CIA intervention, but the book as a whole focuses more on the mentality that developed in the public rather than the foreign influences, on the grassroots engine of a revolution. I really enjoyed the way he depicted Mosaddegh, the prime minister, and his fraught relationship with the Shah. He also stays away from dry historical facts like exact dates and random names in favour of some journalistic liberties to give a simpler, purer portrait of events.
The best thing about this book is that it made me do research. I was on the internet every few pages looking things up out if genuine curiousity, because it got me so invested in finding out every detail. I didn't know very much about the Iranian Revolution before so I'm so glad I read this.
jmmoth's review against another edition
3.0
Read this for a graduate course; I probably wouldn't have picked this up on my own TBH.
Poetic journalism with lots of observation on a giant moment in history that is often overlooked or misunderstood in American classrooms. Does a better job at educating when it's accompanied by a more precise historical account of the events, and I wish the preface was included in the 1992 Vintage edition. But Kapuściński is a total marvel with form and words. I'm excited to read more of his work now.
Poetic journalism with lots of observation on a giant moment in history that is often overlooked or misunderstood in American classrooms. Does a better job at educating when it's accompanied by a more precise historical account of the events, and I wish the preface was included in the 1992 Vintage edition. But Kapuściński is a total marvel with form and words. I'm excited to read more of his work now.
no_ah's review against another edition
challenging
dark
informative
inspiring
reflective
medium-paced
4.0
artupop's review against another edition
informative
reflective
fast-paced
5.0
Kapuściński crea en este libro un retrato heterogéneo sobre un hecho de consecuencias palpables hasta hoy: La caída de la monarquía en Irán, con el consiguiente ascenso al poder de los ayatollahs teocráticos. Ágil y certero, vaga por la sociedad iraní en su conjunto en busca de respuestas a la caída de una monarquía milenaria y rica, de afán aparentemente modernizador; pero que escondía tal red de corruptela y violencia que creó la alienación que alimentó su fin. Una vívida reconstrucción de qué y cómo llega un pueblo a protagonizar sangrientas manifestaciones y marchas para cambiarlo todo... sin cambiar nada en el fondo. Un imprescindible, uno más, del autor polaco.
meyshka's review against another edition
3.0
This was... okay.
It does take skill to condense a section of history like this in such a small space and still remain (mostly) coherent.
However, especially off the back of reading a book by an actual Iranian, the sweeping generalisations and cold unnuanced readings hidden within florid language do wear thin.
The testimonies from the people there and the descriptions of images (though improved if they could be included) was the best bit. The less it was about him being an authority on the subject and the more he focused on the journalistic side the better.
It does take skill to condense a section of history like this in such a small space and still remain (mostly) coherent.
However, especially off the back of reading a book by an actual Iranian, the sweeping generalisations and cold unnuanced readings hidden within florid language do wear thin.
The testimonies from the people there and the descriptions of images (though improved if they could be included) was the best bit. The less it was about him being an authority on the subject and the more he focused on the journalistic side the better.