Reviews

Frankenstein v Bagdade by Ahmed Saadawi

jtisgreen's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark funny mysterious reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25

dinaisakov's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional informative mysterious reflective sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

I had a very hard time putting a number to my ranking for this book because I just don’t know how I feel about it. There were some parts that I really enjoyed, but in terms of the whole picture, I am not sure I get it. 
 
Throughout this book, Ahmed Saadawi does an excellent job brining to light human essence. I felt that all the characters could actually be real people, and the way in which they thought and reacted in their war-riddled environment was very impactful. So hats off to Saadawi for being able to achieve this—I thoroughly enjoyed this aspect of the book. 
 
I believe the part I can’t get past is the constant perspective shifts, I found it took away from the essences of the story and am still unsure how certain pieces of the book come together, a lot was left up in the air. I believe this might have been done with intention since in the context of war, some stories don’t have the privilege of being finished, but I wonder what Saadawi wished to accomplish with this book overall. 
 
I felt that there were many pieces of a big puzzle given to us, and I am not sure that the picture was wrapped up entirely in a way that allowed the story to leave an overall impactful message. This is the kind of book with A LOT of potential, but I am not sure if it was pieced together effectively, maybe the book needed to be longer…? 
 
The overall writing and portrayal of the characters is beautiful, Saadawi is a great writer. I actually read this book alongside a friend, and I found this very helpful. It’s a challenging read, not something you can just skim through, but something you need to give a lot of thought. Saadawi does a lot of show and not tell, so you need to really think about why he created certain characters. I believe I would have enjoyed this book more if I was in a classroom breaking it down for all of it’s literary elements.  
 
<Overall, I wish I saw more of the Frankenstein in the book, but maybe that was not the point, and he was more of a symbol. I just feel like if you’re going to title a book “Frankenstein in Bagdhad” then maybe the Frankenstein should be the center of the piece? Of course it does not have to be this way, but I went into the book thinking it would be, so I guess that’s why I was taken aback by that.>
 
I am glad that I was able to get through this book—definitely a good learning curve. 

martareader's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

3.5*
RTC on my booktube channel

elewewhy's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

I never know what to say about ambitious novels that don't quite meet their ambition.
I'm glad it wasn't a by the numbers read. But I'm not sure this book ever figures out what it is and what it's trying to do.

That said, the story is inventive and interesting enough. Just don't keep reading because you expect it to end up somewhere plotwise, characterwise, themewise.

The book raises a lot of interesting ideas without fully exploring them. And then takes other interesting ideas and says them straightforwardly, when showing the theme through the story would be more effective and intriguing.

I will definitely read future stuff by this author, because anything that does meet the ambition of this book will be a classic.

ozblom24's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

100booksyearly's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging mysterious tense slow-paced

3.5

dilon_s's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional mysterious reflective sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? N/A
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75

fireweed15's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

What to say, what to say… This was a fascinating concept, which is why I feel a little let down having finished it now. The summary was brilliant, but the slowest of slow burns made it feel tedious. I was also a little disappointed in how quickly the how and the why of Whatsitsname came to be, like… The mystery's over, you can go home now? Maybe there's something that got lost in translation that I missed being a monolingual.

pangnaolin's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark mysterious reflective sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

Having not read the original Frankenstein, I was excited & intrigued to, yet slightly unsure about taking this book on, but it definitely turned out interesting and worth it. I loved the way Saadawi developed the Whatsitsname [or Frankenstein] throughout the novel-- first just a creation, and then something looking for revenge, and then just questioning itself and trying to stay alive, acting more like a human than a monster as it felt itself being taken advantage of more and more.

I felt like he took an interesting route, focusing not just on the 'monster,' but also on the lives of different people surrounding the monster and his creator, and although those stories were definitely worth hearing in one way or another, it also got really confusing to try and follow everyone-- especially while listening to an audiobook version. I almost wonder if he should've written another book about Iraq during the American invasion without the magical realist element as well and put those stories in there, because-- again-- they were good, just made the 'Frankenstein' story suffer. I just wanted more of the monster and his creator, and less of everyone else.

I also sort of wanted it to be darker and grittier than it really turned out, but I felt like that possibility got a little dampened as Saadawi just sort of... told us everything that was happening in plain words at all times. I wish more had been left for the reader to piece together, and that it had leaned a little more into the weirdness and confusion of it all. I'm not sure.

I definitely loved this, and I think it gave an incredibly interesting point of view on the invasion, while also tackling the idea of good/bad binaries and how they really play out, especially in things like war, but I also just felt like it was lacking in a lot of places, and found myself bored in between sprinkled really interesting moments.

louiza_read2live's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

An explosion; a man who stitches together pieces of body parts laying around in an attempt to make a whole body to present for burial; a story of revenge or vengeance, depending on how one sees it; a story of war and the people touched by it; a story of loss that raises thought-provoking questions such as: Who's to bear the blame in a war, if anyone? Is there any one innocent or are we all to blame?

In Frankenstein in Baghdad, Iraqi author Ahmed Saadawi presents us with unexpected twists that end the story with more unanswered questions, more problems than solutions--Isn't that what a war brings after all? This book left me with sad, unfinished, very uncomfortable feelings, but it was worth it. Anyway, when is it that war, death, and loss can ever leave us feeling comfortable & satisfied as if now we have all the questions answered and all the problems solved? I read Frankenstein in Baghdad four years ago, and I plan to reread it soon in order to understand it better. The story is difficult to follow, especially in the beginning, and in some parts the reading is very slow paced. Nevertheless, it is a book worth reading. Frankenstein in Baghdad is an intriguing and disturbing story, at times a little humorous (albeit dark humor), but a very dark account of the effects of war. Saadawi has very cleverly manipulated the story of Frankenstein by Mary Shelley to tell the story of war-afflicted Iraq. The amalgamation of the real and the absurd sometimes can confuse the reader; however, this adds power to the story as also do the (what felt to me) distant to the reader, objectionable, antipathetic, and unreliable characters.